Sunday, 11 September 2011

Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang

Seems to be that pretty much everyone in the institute wants to know which CulSec banged whom and why there's so much banging all around.

So to clear the air on the chicken and egg story on whether Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang or there was someone else in between.

To draw your own conclusions, watch the video at :  


To know more about the chicken and the egg:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_or_the_egg
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

29 comments:

  1. Instistud11 September 2011 at 09:59

    So will the cul-sec please clarify if khabba banged bang or bang banged khabba

    ReplyDelete
  2. khabba bang11 September 2011 at 10:02

    So will the cul-sec please clarify if khabba banged bang or bang banged khabba

    ReplyDelete
  3. BJ11 September 2011 at 10:02

    Will the real banger please stand up

    ReplyDelete
  4. N Dheeraj11 September 2011 at 10:02

    I like Saruku's comment. But I can't CLICK like. Because this isn't Facebook and because Khabba banded Bang, or bang banged Khabba, does it really matter?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:04

    anonymous1 banged anonymous2....
    anonymous2 banged anonymous1

    ReplyDelete
  6. N Dheeraj11 September 2011 at 10:04

    Bangers cannot stand up. They are banged Khabba. Have mercy on bang banged Khabba and don't ask him to stand. Let them be done with it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. prudhvi raj11 September 2011 at 10:05

    “Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang” sounds funny right?
    who ever was banged i don't care. i want to know why are they banged.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:07

    its so cool :D

    ReplyDelete
  9. N Dheeraj11 September 2011 at 10:08

    I wanted a video of all the bang banged khabba khabba banged bang-ing!!!!!!!!!! Put one on youtube, someone :D

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:21

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrO4YZeyl0I&ob=av3e
    there u go

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hitesh11 September 2011 at 10:23

    Go Pogo!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:23

    “Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang” but finally.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .i dont know wat happened

    ReplyDelete
  13. steamer11 September 2011 at 10:28

    is "bang" commutative??
    is "khabba banged bang"=="bang banged khabba"??

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:33

    a special case of bang called "69" is commutative

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:33

    “Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang” sounds funny right?
    who ever was banged i don't care. i want to know why are they banged.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:34

    Director Idichandy....... iitm

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous11 September 2011 at 10:43

    bang bang bang

    ReplyDelete
  18. steamer11 September 2011 at 10:56

    is "bang" associative??

    ReplyDelete
  19. prudhvi raj11 September 2011 at 11:02

    Bang banged Khabba, Khabba Banged banged bang.
    this is how it is Bang banged Khabba , Khabba Banged Bang

    ReplyDelete
  20. Adj11 September 2011 at 11:04

    biattchhh ...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Jayadev11 September 2011 at 11:10

    "Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang".

    The whole universe started with a big bang.

    ReplyDelete
  22. prudhvi raj11 September 2011 at 11:13

    “Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang” because he just wanted to have fun. the latter happened and i am sleepy

    ReplyDelete
  23. ste@mer11 September 2011 at 11:21

    (khabba banged bang) bang anonymous1 = khabba bang (bang banged anonymous1)

    let khabba banged bang==anonymous2

    so LHS becomes anonymous2 bang anonymous1

    bang banged anonymous1==anonymous3

    RHS is khabba banged anonymous3
    solution1:
    so bang being associative is possible only when khabba==anonymous2 && anonymous1==anonymous3
    but anonymous2 is the product of khabba and bang.implying,if khabba==anonymous2 and anonymous2 is the product of khabba,the only possible solution is khabba is an amoeba......

    solution2:
    also arises the case when bang==69.so when bang==69,
    anonymous2==anonymous3...
    implying khabba banged bang==bang banged anonymous1
    implying khabba==anonymous1...

    ^^conditions for the case of bang to be associative

    ReplyDelete
  24. steamer11 September 2011 at 11:25

    but when bang==69,
    a bang b==null.
    so solution2 is challenged...

    ReplyDelete
  25. DDD11 September 2011 at 11:42

    “Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang”
    Khabba is god

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous12 September 2011 at 00:52

    did khabba bang bang first or did bang bang khabba first..??

    ReplyDelete
  27. YAGNAM LOKESH12 September 2011 at 00:54

    "Bang banged Khabba, Khabba banged Bang".

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous12 September 2011 at 00:56

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaVNfZWBVhQ

    ReplyDelete
  29. steamer13 September 2011 at 07:19

    bang bang bangity bang,i said bang bang bangity bang

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)